<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Competition Commission of India finds Container Trailer Owners Coordination Committee (CTOCC) and its sub-associations to be indulging in anti-competitive conduct; Directs them to desist from indulging in the anti-competitive conduct</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=18572</link>
    <description>The Commission found that CTOCC and four participating trailer associations used a centrally controlled &#039;Turn System&#039; to effect unilateral price fixation, creating a presumption of appreciable adverse effect on competition under the horizontal agreement provisions, which was not satisfactorily rebutted, resulting in a contravention of Section 3(3)(a) read with Section 3(1); ten office bearers were held individually responsible under the liability provisions and the associations were directed to cease the anti-competitive conduct, though no monetary penalties were imposed given mitigating factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:46:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Competition Commission of India finds Container Trailer Owners Coordination Committee (CTOCC) and its sub-associations to be indulging in anti-competitive conduct; Directs them to desist from indulging in the anti-competitive conduct</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=18572</link>
      <description>The Commission found that CTOCC and four participating trailer associations used a centrally controlled &#039;Turn System&#039; to effect unilateral price fixation, creating a presumption of appreciable adverse effect on competition under the horizontal agreement provisions, which was not satisfactorily rebutted, resulting in a contravention of Section 3(3)(a) read with Section 3(1); ten office bearers were held individually responsible under the liability provisions and the associations were directed to cease the anti-competitive conduct, though no monetary penalties were imposed given mitigating factors.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:46:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=18572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>