https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346066 A second review application was not maintainable after the first review application was not entertained. The proper remedy in that situation was to challenge the refusal through writ jurisdiction rather than to file another review before the Tribunal. The Rajasthan HC therefore treated the second review as impermissible and indicated writ proceedings as the correct course. The matter was disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to pursue writ proceedings within the stipulated time. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Aug 2017 18:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346066 A second review application was not maintainable after the first review application was not entertained. The proper remedy in that situation was to challenge the refusal through writ jurisdiction rather than to file another review before the Tribunal. The Rajasthan HC therefore treated the second review as impermissible and indicated writ proceedings as the correct course. The matter was disposed of with liberty to the Revenue to pursue writ proceedings within the stipulated time. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346066