<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 121 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346063</link>
    <description>Interest earned on fixed deposits created during winding up was assessable as income from other sources, and the borrowing costs could not be netted against that income. Deduction under section 57(iii) was unavailable because the interest on borrowings was not expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for earning the fixed-deposit interest, and no sufficient nexus existed between the borrowings and the income. The principle applied was that interest income cannot be reduced unless the statute expressly permits the deduction or set-off. The claimed set-off was therefore not permissible and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:18:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 121 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346063</link>
      <description>Interest earned on fixed deposits created during winding up was assessable as income from other sources, and the borrowing costs could not be netted against that income. Deduction under section 57(iii) was unavailable because the interest on borrowings was not expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for earning the fixed-deposit interest, and no sufficient nexus existed between the borrowings and the income. The principle applied was that interest income cannot be reduced unless the statute expressly permits the deduction or set-off. The claimed set-off was therefore not permissible and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>