<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 107 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346049</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted the matter, and directed that it be tagged with Civil Appeal No. 6542 of 2011. The order records only these procedural directions and does not decide the substantive central excise issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 107 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346049</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, admitted the matter, and directed that it be tagged with Civil Appeal No. 6542 of 2011. The order records only these procedural directions and does not decide the substantive central excise issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>