https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346045 The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand for a specific quantity of Biris but remanded the case for readjudication on other charges. The Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed a substantial duty demand with penalties on the appellant and its partners. The Tribunal upheld the duty demand based on discrepancies in stock verification and entries in notebooks, justifying the charge of clandestine removal. Penalties were imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, with adjustments made to the duty demand and penalties for certain partners. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2017 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346045 The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand for a specific quantity of Biris but remanded the case for readjudication on other charges. The Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed a substantial duty demand with penalties on the appellant and its partners. The Tribunal upheld the duty demand based on discrepancies in stock verification and entries in notebooks, justifying the charge of clandestine removal. Penalties were imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, with adjustments made to the duty demand and penalties for certain partners. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346045