<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 101 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346043</link>
    <description>Interest on wrongly availed Cenvat credit is stated to be recoverable only within the prescribed limitation period, and where the show cause notice contains no allegation of suppression or other facts needed to invoke the extended period, the demand is unsustainable. Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is also said to require specific allegations of suppression, fraud or wilful misstatement; in their absence, mandatory penalty cannot be imposed. The text further notes that an order combining Section 11AC with a reduced penalty is internally inconsistent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:16:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 101 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346043</link>
      <description>Interest on wrongly availed Cenvat credit is stated to be recoverable only within the prescribed limitation period, and where the show cause notice contains no allegation of suppression or other facts needed to invoke the extended period, the demand is unsustainable. Penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is also said to require specific allegations of suppression, fraud or wilful misstatement; in their absence, mandatory penalty cannot be imposed. The text further notes that an order combining Section 11AC with a reduced penalty is internally inconsistent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>