<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 90 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act on the appellant, Shri Pradeep S. Mehta, as penalties proposed under Section 114A in the Show Cause Notice cannot be imposed under Section 112. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the appropriation of Rs. 28 lakhs deposited by Vishal Exports towards the penalty imposed on Paresh H. Parekh was irregular and lacked legal basis. The Tribunal allowed both appeals (C/248/2007 and C/249/2007), with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 90 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act on the appellant, Shri Pradeep S. Mehta, as penalties proposed under Section 114A in the Show Cause Notice cannot be imposed under Section 112. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the appropriation of Rs. 28 lakhs deposited by Vishal Exports towards the penalty imposed on Paresh H. Parekh was irregular and lacked legal basis. The Tribunal allowed both appeals (C/248/2007 and C/249/2007), with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>