<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1225 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193515</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the treatment of share application money under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intentions and citing precedents. The court did not address the issue of exemption under section 54F for investments in multiple residential properties, admitting the appeal solely on that specific question for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:15:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1225 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193515</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the treatment of share application money under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intentions and citing precedents. The court did not address the issue of exemption under section 54F for investments in multiple residential properties, admitting the appeal solely on that specific question for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>