<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193524</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee due to the unexplained delay of 300 days in filing the appeal before ITAT. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of sufficient cause for condonation of delay and highlighted that each case must be evaluated based on its specific facts and circumstances. The decision underscores the need for parties to pursue legal remedies diligently and with valid justifications for any delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:15:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193524</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee due to the unexplained delay of 300 days in filing the appeal before ITAT. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of sufficient cause for condonation of delay and highlighted that each case must be evaluated based on its specific facts and circumstances. The decision underscores the need for parties to pursue legal remedies diligently and with valid justifications for any delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>