<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9392</link>
    <description>The court held in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, ruling that the value of the assessee&#039;s interest in the association of persons was liable to be included in the net wealth of the assessee for wealth-tax purposes. The court clarified that an association of persons is not a legal entity for wealth-tax assessment under the Wealth-tax Act, and the interest of the assessee in the association should be valued according to Rule 2 of the Wealth-tax Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9392</link>
      <description>The court held in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, ruling that the value of the assessee&#039;s interest in the association of persons was liable to be included in the net wealth of the assessee for wealth-tax purposes. The court clarified that an association of persons is not a legal entity for wealth-tax assessment under the Wealth-tax Act, and the interest of the assessee in the association should be valued according to Rule 2 of the Wealth-tax Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>