<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 73 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346015</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals for both assessment years. The judgment focused on interpreting tax laws and classifying assets to determine the correct rate of depreciation, ultimately allowing the assessee to claim depreciation at 60% for software assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 73 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346015</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals for both assessment years. The judgment focused on interpreting tax laws and classifying assets to determine the correct rate of depreciation, ultimately allowing the assessee to claim depreciation at 60% for software assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>