<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346014</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals in ITA No. 1677 and 1678, upholding the Ld. CIT (Appeals) decisions to delete additions related to stock valuation discrepancies and provision for rate difference. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper maintenance of books of accounts and lack of evidence of suppression, ruling that additions based on stock differences should be supported by adequate material and not arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346014</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals in ITA No. 1677 and 1678, upholding the Ld. CIT (Appeals) decisions to delete additions related to stock valuation discrepancies and provision for rate difference. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper maintenance of books of accounts and lack of evidence of suppression, ruling that additions based on stock differences should be supported by adequate material and not arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>