<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 71 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the rate increase in service tax on 10.9.2004 did not apply to the appellant&#039;s maintenance and repair services provided under annual contracts initiated before the change. Citing legal precedents and circulars, the Tribunal emphasized that the prevailing tax rate at the time of service provision governed, leading to the conclusion that no additional service tax was owed. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was not liable for any differential service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 71 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the rate increase in service tax on 10.9.2004 did not apply to the appellant&#039;s maintenance and repair services provided under annual contracts initiated before the change. Citing legal precedents and circulars, the Tribunal emphasized that the prevailing tax rate at the time of service provision governed, leading to the conclusion that no additional service tax was owed. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was not liable for any differential service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>