<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 66 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 46,34,733 for denial of Cenvat credit, confirmed the demand of Rs. 2,85,123 for clearances to related persons at lower prices, along with interest and penalty, and remanded the matter to verify if interest on supplementary invoices was paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 66 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 46,34,733 for denial of Cenvat credit, confirmed the demand of Rs. 2,85,123 for clearances to related persons at lower prices, along with interest and penalty, and remanded the matter to verify if interest on supplementary invoices was paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>