https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346007 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the case involving allegations of clandestine removal of goods based on burning loss percentages exceeding 2%. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence to support duty demands solely based on high burning loss percentages. As the show cause notices were primarily issued on the basis of audit findings without additional evidence, the tribunal found the demands unsustainable and set aside the orders, allowing the appeals with any consequential relief. The decision underscored the importance of tangible evidence in duty-related allegations and upheld fairness in the matter. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346007 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in the case involving allegations of clandestine removal of goods based on burning loss percentages exceeding 2%. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence to support duty demands solely based on high burning loss percentages. As the show cause notices were primarily issued on the basis of audit findings without additional evidence, the tribunal found the demands unsustainable and set aside the orders, allowing the appeals with any consequential relief. The decision underscored the importance of tangible evidence in duty-related allegations and upheld fairness in the matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346007