<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 61 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Rule 15(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 excessive and reduced it significantly due to the absence of evidence of intent to evade duty. The appellant&#039;s belief in availing CENVAT credit on service tax for outward transportation of goods was deemed unacceptable for the later period after the law had changed. The appeal was disposed of with modifications, reducing the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 61 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Rule 15(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 excessive and reduced it significantly due to the absence of evidence of intent to evade duty. The appellant&#039;s belief in availing CENVAT credit on service tax for outward transportation of goods was deemed unacceptable for the later period after the law had changed. The appeal was disposed of with modifications, reducing the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>