<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 60 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the denial of cenvat credit on various taxable services. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after granting the appellant a hearing opportunity. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility for cenvat benefit on security agency service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:38:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 60 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant concerning the denial of cenvat credit on various taxable services. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after granting the appellant a hearing opportunity. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the eligibility for cenvat benefit on security agency service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>