<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 58 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346000</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI remanded the appeal to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Panvel Division due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide necessary details. The appellant must furnish the information within four weeks and present its defense. This decision follows the earlier dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:38:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 58 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346000</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI remanded the appeal to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Panvel Division due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide necessary details. The appellant must furnish the information within four weeks and present its defense. This decision follows the earlier dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>