https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345998 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the original adjudicating authority to decide the jurisdiction issue after the Supreme Court's decision. The Tribunal emphasized maintaining the status quo and ensuring the assessee's right to be heard, following a similar course of action in consideration of pending appeals and conflicting High Court decisions. The Tribunal aimed to uphold fairness and rights of the assessee by resolving the jurisdiction issue first before proceeding on the merits post the Supreme Court's decision. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:38:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345998 The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the original adjudicating authority to decide the jurisdiction issue after the Supreme Court's decision. The Tribunal emphasized maintaining the status quo and ensuring the assessee's right to be heard, following a similar course of action in consideration of pending appeals and conflicting High Court decisions. The Tribunal aimed to uphold fairness and rights of the assessee by resolving the jurisdiction issue first before proceeding on the merits post the Supreme Court's decision. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345998