<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345994</link>
    <description>A penalty for undervaluation under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act could not rest on a ground not covered by the show-cause notice, because the assessee was not put to notice under the relevant provision and a penalty cannot travel beyond its pleaded foundation. Undervaluation also had to be assessed by reference to the local market rate at the place of transaction; reliance on rates from other cities did not satisfy the statutory test. The penalty order was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for further proceedings in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345994</link>
      <description>A penalty for undervaluation under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act could not rest on a ground not covered by the show-cause notice, because the assessee was not put to notice under the relevant provision and a penalty cannot travel beyond its pleaded foundation. Undervaluation also had to be assessed by reference to the local market rate at the place of transaction; reliance on rates from other cities did not satisfy the statutory test. The penalty order was therefore unsustainable, and the matter was remitted for further proceedings in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>