https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345989 The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a civil suit challenging the appointment of directors under the Companies Act, 2013. It ruled that non-members could not bypass the statutory mechanism by approaching the civil court and that the National Company Law Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction over company management issues. The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, the trial court's order was set aside, and the plaint was rejected, emphasizing the adequacy of remedies under the Companies Act and the exclusion of civil court jurisdiction in such matters. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345989 The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a civil suit challenging the appointment of directors under the Companies Act, 2013. It ruled that non-members could not bypass the statutory mechanism by approaching the civil court and that the National Company Law Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction over company management issues. The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, the trial court's order was set aside, and the plaint was rejected, emphasizing the adequacy of remedies under the Companies Act and the exclusion of civil court jurisdiction in such matters. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345989