https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345988 The court quashed proceedings against the second accused, ruling that only the individual who issued the bounced cheque could be held liable under the Negotiable Instrument Act. Transferred between courts due to jurisdictional issues, the case emphasized individual liability. The judgment directed the trial court to expedite proceedings, enabling the complainant to pursue legal remedies against other accused parties. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:37:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345988 The court quashed proceedings against the second accused, ruling that only the individual who issued the bounced cheque could be held liable under the Negotiable Instrument Act. Transferred between courts due to jurisdictional issues, the case emphasized individual liability. The judgment directed the trial court to expedite proceedings, enabling the complainant to pursue legal remedies against other accused parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345988