https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345987 The High Court partially allowed the Criminal Revision case, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the 3rd accused while confirming the same for the other accused. The court emphasized the importance of evidence, burden of proof, and statutory presumptions in cases involving negotiable instruments. The judgment detailed the accused's failed defense regarding misuse of blank cheques, establishing guilt based on evidence of dishonored cheques and lack of supporting evidence for the defense's claims. The court's decision highlighted the significance of meeting the burden of proof and addressing statutory presumptions in such cases. en-us Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Aug 2017 08:37:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345987 The High Court partially allowed the Criminal Revision case, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the 3rd accused while confirming the same for the other accused. The court emphasized the importance of evidence, burden of proof, and statutory presumptions in cases involving negotiable instruments. The judgment detailed the accused's failed defense regarding misuse of blank cheques, establishing guilt based on evidence of dishonored cheques and lack of supporting evidence for the defense's claims. The court's decision highlighted the significance of meeting the burden of proof and addressing statutory presumptions in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345987