https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9371 The court upheld the validity of the order under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, citing the complex nature of the accounts, allegations of benami transactions, and the failure to file the return for the block period as justifications. The court found the appointment of an auditor to be justified and ruled that the exercise of power was objective and compliant with legal provisions, dismissing the petition. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9371 The court upheld the validity of the order under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, citing the complex nature of the accounts, allegations of benami transactions, and the failure to file the return for the block period as justifications. The court found the appointment of an auditor to be justified and ruled that the exercise of power was objective and compliant with legal provisions, dismissing the petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9371