<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 41 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9368</link>
    <description>A gift of movable property made by a non-resident ordinarily resident in Dubai to a resident donee in Kashmir fell within the exemption under section 5(1)(ii) of the Gift-tax Act because the statutory conditions were satisfied. The transaction was not a colourable device merely because it was structured to obtain a lawful tax advantage. The analysis applies the principle that legitimate tax planning within the framework of the statute does not become tax evasion unless the arrangement lacks legal substance or falls outside the exemption. The Revenue&#039;s broader reliance on McDowell was rejected in light of the later exposition in Azadi Bachao Andolan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 41 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9368</link>
      <description>A gift of movable property made by a non-resident ordinarily resident in Dubai to a resident donee in Kashmir fell within the exemption under section 5(1)(ii) of the Gift-tax Act because the statutory conditions were satisfied. The transaction was not a colourable device merely because it was structured to obtain a lawful tax advantage. The analysis applies the principle that legitimate tax planning within the framework of the statute does not become tax evasion unless the arrangement lacks legal substance or falls outside the exemption. The Revenue&#039;s broader reliance on McDowell was rejected in light of the later exposition in Azadi Bachao Andolan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>