<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 14 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345956</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding alleged clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence, absence of physical verification, and theoretical nature of computer printouts. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere, highlighting the importance of proper evidence and physical verification in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 14 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345956</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding alleged clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence, absence of physical verification, and theoretical nature of computer printouts. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere, highlighting the importance of proper evidence and physical verification in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>