<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 12 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345954</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, directing the Respondent to process and pay the refund claims for the period from 27th March, 2015 to 31st March, 2015, along with interest, within three weeks. The Court emphasized consistency in accepting CA certificates and other documentation for refund claims, rejecting objections on unjust enrichment and maintainability of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 12 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345954</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, directing the Respondent to process and pay the refund claims for the period from 27th March, 2015 to 31st March, 2015, along with interest, within three weeks. The Court emphasized consistency in accepting CA certificates and other documentation for refund claims, rejecting objections on unjust enrichment and maintainability of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>