<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 9 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined to condone a delay of over 720 days in filing an appeal, citing the applicant&#039;s claim of being unaware of the order as insufficient justification. Despite arguments of lack of intentionality and natural justice principles, the Tribunal found that the company&#039;s employee had received the order but failed to inform management promptly. Consequently, the application for condonation was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 9 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined to condone a delay of over 720 days in filing an appeal, citing the applicant&#039;s claim of being unaware of the order as insufficient justification. Despite arguments of lack of intentionality and natural justice principles, the Tribunal found that the company&#039;s employee had received the order but failed to inform management promptly. Consequently, the application for condonation was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>