<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 8 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345950</link>
    <description>A valid and subsisting entitlement certificate under the incentive scheme bound the assessing officer, and exemption could not be denied on an independent view that the activity was not manufacturing. Section 41C provided that exemption would cease only on cancellation or expiry of the certificate, and the power to cancel or question its validity lay with the statutory authority under the Act. As the certificate remained uncancelled and operative, the assessee continued to receive exemption benefits for the covered activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 8 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345950</link>
      <description>A valid and subsisting entitlement certificate under the incentive scheme bound the assessing officer, and exemption could not be denied on an independent view that the activity was not manufacturing. Section 41C provided that exemption would cease only on cancellation or expiry of the certificate, and the power to cancel or question its validity lay with the statutory authority under the Act. As the certificate remained uncancelled and operative, the assessee continued to receive exemption benefits for the covered activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>