<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 7 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345949</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan, who was to pass an appropriate order within three months. The court found that the Tax Board acted within its jurisdiction and that the input tax credit claims were not legitimate under the applicable legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 7 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345949</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan, who was to pass an appropriate order within three months. The court found that the Tax Board acted within its jurisdiction and that the input tax credit claims were not legitimate under the applicable legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>