https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345944 Special leave to appeal against acquittal in a cheque dishonour prosecution was declined because the accused had raised a probable defence that the cheque was issued as security in a chit transaction. The Madras HC noted that the record included documentary evidence and oral testimony supporting the defence, while the complainant failed to establish a prima facie basis for reversing the trial court's view. Applying the settled standard for interference with an acquittal, the Court held that interference is justified only where the trial court's view is perverse, arbitrary, or based on a wrong appreciation of law and facts. No interference with the acquittal was called for. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:04:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345944 Special leave to appeal against acquittal in a cheque dishonour prosecution was declined because the accused had raised a probable defence that the cheque was issued as security in a chit transaction. The Madras HC noted that the record included documentary evidence and oral testimony supporting the defence, while the complainant failed to establish a prima facie basis for reversing the trial court's view. Applying the settled standard for interference with an acquittal, the Court held that interference is justified only where the trial court's view is perverse, arbitrary, or based on a wrong appreciation of law and facts. No interference with the acquittal was called for. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345944