https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193473 A claimant's appeal in a land acquisition matter was held not maintainable as an independent appeal and could not be converted into cross-objections, because cross-objections are accessory to an already pending appeal. The Court also accepted that the objection regarding the Punjab State as a necessary party went to the competence of the appeal. On compensation, the market value of the acquired land was upheld on the basis adopted in the connected matter, and the awards for fruit trees, tubewell and building were sustained. Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act was read as limiting only the aggregate award to the amount claimed, not each separate head of compensation. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:32:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193473 A claimant's appeal in a land acquisition matter was held not maintainable as an independent appeal and could not be converted into cross-objections, because cross-objections are accessory to an already pending appeal. The Court also accepted that the objection regarding the Punjab State as a necessary party went to the competence of the appeal. On compensation, the market value of the acquired land was upheld on the basis adopted in the connected matter, and the awards for fruit trees, tubewell and building were sustained. Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act was read as limiting only the aggregate award to the amount claimed, not each separate head of compensation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193473