https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193470 The plaintiff filed a revision challenging the Senior Sub Judge's decision that their suit under order 37 Civil Procedure Code was time-barred. The plaintiff had given a loan to the respondent, and when the interest cheque was dishonored, they filed the suit after a significant delay. The court held that the suit was not barred by time, interpreting Section 19 of the Limitation Act liberally to include payment by cheque as valid for extending the limitation period. The revision was allowed, and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:01:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193470 The plaintiff filed a revision challenging the Senior Sub Judge's decision that their suit under order 37 Civil Procedure Code was time-barred. The plaintiff had given a loan to the respondent, and when the interest cheque was dishonored, they filed the suit after a significant delay. The court held that the suit was not barred by time, interpreting Section 19 of the Limitation Act liberally to include payment by cheque as valid for extending the limitation period. The revision was allowed, and the case was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193470