<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9344</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the appointment of a special auditor under Section 142(2A) as justified and legally sound. It was determined that no show-cause notice or hearing was necessary before issuing the order, and the remuneration set for the special auditor was deemed reasonable. The request to declare Section 142(2A) unconstitutional was not addressed due to the lack of arguments presented on this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9344</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the appointment of a special auditor under Section 142(2A) as justified and legally sound. It was determined that no show-cause notice or hearing was necessary before issuing the order, and the remuneration set for the special auditor was deemed reasonable. The request to declare Section 142(2A) unconstitutional was not addressed due to the lack of arguments presented on this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>