<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345941</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the registration of the respondent Trust by the DIT (Exemptions). The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the alleged violations of trust objectives, such as selling land for commercial purposes and routing scholarship payments through another foundation, were not accepted. The Court found that the Trust&#039;s actions were in line with its intended purpose, including the purchase of a luxury car for trust purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s thorough evaluation of the evidence led to the dismissal of the appeal, as no significant legal issues were raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345941</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the registration of the respondent Trust by the DIT (Exemptions). The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the alleged violations of trust objectives, such as selling land for commercial purposes and routing scholarship payments through another foundation, were not accepted. The Court found that the Trust&#039;s actions were in line with its intended purpose, including the purchase of a luxury car for trust purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s thorough evaluation of the evidence led to the dismissal of the appeal, as no significant legal issues were raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>