https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345939 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the second respondent's order refusing a refund to M/s. Silver Shoes Pvt. Ltd. The Court held that the assets seized did not belong to the petitioner based on previous judgments, including the Supreme Court's findings that the prosecution failed to prove ownership. The second respondent was directed to issue orders in favor of the third respondent, emphasizing that any order contradicting the criminal case judgments would be unlawful. No costs were awarded, and the case was closed. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:14:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345939 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the second respondent's order refusing a refund to M/s. Silver Shoes Pvt. Ltd. The Court held that the assets seized did not belong to the petitioner based on previous judgments, including the Supreme Court's findings that the prosecution failed to prove ownership. The second respondent was directed to issue orders in favor of the third respondent, emphasizing that any order contradicting the criminal case judgments would be unlawful. No costs were awarded, and the case was closed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345939