<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1034 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345922</link>
    <description>Amounts recovered from buyers as transit-related breakage compensation, separate from actual freight and insurance premium, form part of the assessable value and remain dutyable even if shown under transportation cost. The limitation period was restricted to the normal period because the Department was already aware of the valuation method and suppression was not established. Penalty under section 11AC was not sustainable where the dispute turned on valuation interpretation and the surviving demand was confined to the normal period. The document also notes that a separate discount-related issue was remanded for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1034 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345922</link>
      <description>Amounts recovered from buyers as transit-related breakage compensation, separate from actual freight and insurance premium, form part of the assessable value and remain dutyable even if shown under transportation cost. The limitation period was restricted to the normal period because the Department was already aware of the valuation method and suppression was not established. Penalty under section 11AC was not sustainable where the dispute turned on valuation interpretation and the surviving demand was confined to the normal period. The document also notes that a separate discount-related issue was remanded for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>