https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345922 The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of 7% transit insurance charges in the assessable value, citing Surya Roshni Ltd. case. The matter of differential duty on discounts was remanded for verification. The demand for the extended period was restricted to the normal limitation period. Penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were set aside. The demands for insurance charges were upheld for the normal period, while the discounts issue was remanded for verification, and penalties were overturned. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345922 The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of 7% transit insurance charges in the assessable value, citing Surya Roshni Ltd. case. The matter of differential duty on discounts was remanded for verification. The demand for the extended period was restricted to the normal limitation period. Penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were set aside. The demands for insurance charges were upheld for the normal period, while the discounts issue was remanded for verification, and penalties were overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345922