https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345920 The appellant appealed against the rejection of their appeal by the Commissioner (A) regarding the clearance of excisable goods to SEZ Developers without duty payment. The issue centered on the demand of Central Excise duty under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Division Bench precedent established that supplies to SEZ from DTA are deemed exports, allowing CENVAT credit without separate accounts. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, favoring the appellant and granting relief in the case. en-us Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345920 The appellant appealed against the rejection of their appeal by the Commissioner (A) regarding the clearance of excisable goods to SEZ Developers without duty payment. The issue centered on the demand of Central Excise duty under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Division Bench precedent established that supplies to SEZ from DTA are deemed exports, allowing CENVAT credit without separate accounts. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, favoring the appellant and granting relief in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345920