<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1416 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193466</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It found that the appellant&#039;s transactions with Celestial Biologicals Limited were market-driven and not intended to unduly benefit the related party. The ITAT concluded that the appellant&#039;s charitable nature and financial dealings were transparent and justified, noting that the AO&#039;s disallowance of depreciation and denial of exemption under Sections 11 &amp;amp; 12 were incorrect. The ITAT emphasized that the appellant followed applicable accounting standards and that the revenue from selling Fresh Frozen Plasma added to profit, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:11:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1416 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193466</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions. It found that the appellant&#039;s transactions with Celestial Biologicals Limited were market-driven and not intended to unduly benefit the related party. The ITAT concluded that the appellant&#039;s charitable nature and financial dealings were transparent and justified, noting that the AO&#039;s disallowance of depreciation and denial of exemption under Sections 11 &amp;amp; 12 were incorrect. The ITAT emphasized that the appellant followed applicable accounting standards and that the revenue from selling Fresh Frozen Plasma added to profit, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>