<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1281 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the valuation of a property for capital gains tax computation under Sec. 50C of the Income Tax Act. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the Stamp Valuation Authority&#039;s valuation, leading to the adoption of the SVA value for tax purposes. The judgment stressed the significance of complying with statutory procedures and presenting substantial evidence to contest valuation determinations by tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1281 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the valuation of a property for capital gains tax computation under Sec. 50C of the Income Tax Act. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the Stamp Valuation Authority&#039;s valuation, leading to the adoption of the SVA value for tax purposes. The judgment stressed the significance of complying with statutory procedures and presenting substantial evidence to contest valuation determinations by tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>