<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1129 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193454</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the appeal due to the debatability of the issue surrounding the taxability of a receipt. Despite the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c), the Tribunal found the case unsuitable for penalty imposition. Emphasizing the lack of clarity on the nature of the receipt and the absence of default in disclosing information, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1129 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193454</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the appeal due to the debatability of the issue surrounding the taxability of a receipt. Despite the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c), the Tribunal found the case unsuitable for penalty imposition. Emphasizing the lack of clarity on the nature of the receipt and the absence of default in disclosing information, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>