<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193455</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the exclusion of Apitco Limited, Global Procurement Consultants Limited, and TSR Darashaw Limited from the final set of comparables for Transfer Pricing purposes due to significant functional disparities with the assessee. Emphasizing the importance of functional comparability, the Tribunal referenced a previous judgment and clarified that the Department Representative could not challenge the AO&#039;s decision on company inclusions. The matter was remanded to the AO/TPO for recalculating the Arm&#039;s Length Price of the international transaction, granting the assessee a hearing opportunity, with the appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193455</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the exclusion of Apitco Limited, Global Procurement Consultants Limited, and TSR Darashaw Limited from the final set of comparables for Transfer Pricing purposes due to significant functional disparities with the assessee. Emphasizing the importance of functional comparability, the Tribunal referenced a previous judgment and clarified that the Department Representative could not challenge the AO&#039;s decision on company inclusions. The matter was remanded to the AO/TPO for recalculating the Arm&#039;s Length Price of the international transaction, granting the assessee a hearing opportunity, with the appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>