<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1377 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of telecommunication and foreign travel expenses from total turnover for Section 10A deduction, referencing relevant court decisions. It modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order on the Related Party Transactions (RPT) filter, directing exclusion of companies with more than 15% RPT. Accentia Software Solutions Ltd. and Thirdware Solutions Ltd. were excluded due to profit margins exceeding 50%. Infosys Technologies Ltd. was excluded based on turnover and brand value differences. The Tribunal allowed cross objections, directing exclusion of certain companies as comparables and reevaluation of ALP. Multiple exclusions were upheld, and detailed instructions were provided for accurate computation of deductions and ALP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 08:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1377 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of telecommunication and foreign travel expenses from total turnover for Section 10A deduction, referencing relevant court decisions. It modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order on the Related Party Transactions (RPT) filter, directing exclusion of companies with more than 15% RPT. Accentia Software Solutions Ltd. and Thirdware Solutions Ltd. were excluded due to profit margins exceeding 50%. Infosys Technologies Ltd. was excluded based on turnover and brand value differences. The Tribunal allowed cross objections, directing exclusion of certain companies as comparables and reevaluation of ALP. Multiple exclusions were upheld, and detailed instructions were provided for accurate computation of deductions and ALP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>