<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 36 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that HPS groundnuts exported by the assessee did not qualify as &quot;agricultural primary commodities&quot; under section 80HHC(2)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, entitling the assessee to deduction under section 80HHC. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments and emphasizing that the processed groundnuts were no longer considered primary commodities. The decision was supported by expert evidence and market recognition, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The High Court&#039;s previous stance in a related case further reinforced the Tribunal&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 36 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that HPS groundnuts exported by the assessee did not qualify as &quot;agricultural primary commodities&quot; under section 80HHC(2)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, entitling the assessee to deduction under section 80HHC. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments and emphasizing that the processed groundnuts were no longer considered primary commodities. The decision was supported by expert evidence and market recognition, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The High Court&#039;s previous stance in a related case further reinforced the Tribunal&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>