<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>138 act chuq ritun case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=112475</link>
    <description>Where a respondent charged in a Section 138 cheque dishonour matter fails to appear after three court summons, the appropriate procedural step is for the complainant to apply to the court for an arrest warrant to secure the accused&#039;s presence and enable continuation of prosecution under the negotiable instruments provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2017 03:16:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>138 act chuq ritun case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=112475</link>
      <description>Where a respondent charged in a Section 138 cheque dishonour matter fails to appear after three court summons, the appropriate procedural step is for the complainant to apply to the court for an arrest warrant to secure the accused&#039;s presence and enable continuation of prosecution under the negotiable instruments provisions.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2017 03:16:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=112475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>