<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 122 - High Court Of Madhya Pradesh</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193449</link>
    <description>Section 63 of the Madhya Bharat Co-operative Societies Act, 1954 applies only to persons who, in relation to the society, have misapplied its money or property, retained it, or committed misfeasance or breach of trust. Acts done before the society came into existence, or before the bank&#039;s property vested in it, are not acts in relation to the society. Mere registration of the society did not itself create a trust or vest the bank&#039;s property; that interest arose only on transfer. Liability therefore could not be imposed for dealings with the private bank before transfer, and the impugned orders were without jurisdiction to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 122 - High Court Of Madhya Pradesh</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193449</link>
      <description>Section 63 of the Madhya Bharat Co-operative Societies Act, 1954 applies only to persons who, in relation to the society, have misapplied its money or property, retained it, or committed misfeasance or breach of trust. Acts done before the society came into existence, or before the bank&#039;s property vested in it, are not acts in relation to the society. Mere registration of the society did not itself create a trust or vest the bank&#039;s property; that interest arose only on transfer. Liability therefore could not be imposed for dealings with the private bank before transfer, and the impugned orders were without jurisdiction to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>