<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1942 (12) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193446</link>
    <description>Partnership under Section 239 of the Contract Act is not confined to commercial trading; where persons combine property, labour or skill to exploit house property and share profits, a partnership may arise. On the facts, the house property had been treated as part of the partnership arrangement, and the defendants, having succeeded to their predecessor&#039;s position, assumed his rights and liabilities. The fact that one member of a joint family entered the partnership did not exclude the possibility that other family members were also partners on the evidence. The defendants were therefore bound to render accounts for the full period directed by the trial court, not merely from their father&#039;s death.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1942 (12) TMI 9 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193446</link>
      <description>Partnership under Section 239 of the Contract Act is not confined to commercial trading; where persons combine property, labour or skill to exploit house property and share profits, a partnership may arise. On the facts, the house property had been treated as part of the partnership arrangement, and the defendants, having succeeded to their predecessor&#039;s position, assumed his rights and liabilities. The fact that one member of a joint family entered the partnership did not exclude the possibility that other family members were also partners on the evidence. The defendants were therefore bound to render accounts for the full period directed by the trial court, not merely from their father&#039;s death.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>