<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1019 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193443</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court noted that the issues raised in the appeal were already covered by its earlier judgment reported at 293 ITR 353 and by prior orders in the assessee&#039;s case. As the questions stood concluded by those earlier determinations, the Court found that no substantial question of law remained for adjudication. The appeal was therefore dismissed as governed by precedent, with no fresh legal issue left open for decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 15:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1019 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193443</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court noted that the issues raised in the appeal were already covered by its earlier judgment reported at 293 ITR 353 and by prior orders in the assessee&#039;s case. As the questions stood concluded by those earlier determinations, the Court found that no substantial question of law remained for adjudication. The appeal was therefore dismissed as governed by precedent, with no fresh legal issue left open for decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>