<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 409 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193439</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise matter titled U.O.I. v. Thungabhadra Steel Products Ltd., the Supreme Court (Manohar and Pattanaik JJ.) on 12-5-1998 dismissed the special leave petition; the supplied text records only the dismissal and judicial disposition without substantive reasons or legal reasoning. No operative legal principles, statutory interpretation, or factual findings are provided in the text for summarisation beyond the dismissal of the appeal in the Central Excise proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 12:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 409 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193439</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise matter titled U.O.I. v. Thungabhadra Steel Products Ltd., the Supreme Court (Manohar and Pattanaik JJ.) on 12-5-1998 dismissed the special leave petition; the supplied text records only the dismissal and judicial disposition without substantive reasons or legal reasoning. No operative legal principles, statutory interpretation, or factual findings are provided in the text for summarisation beyond the dismissal of the appeal in the Central Excise proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>