<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1010 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345898</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned notice and order. It held that the reopening of the assessment did not meet the legal requirements under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that there was no failure by the Petitioner to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment and that reopening based on a mere change of opinion is impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 06:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1010 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345898</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned notice and order. It held that the reopening of the assessment did not meet the legal requirements under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that there was no failure by the Petitioner to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment and that reopening based on a mere change of opinion is impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>